Test warning on conflicting features ================================================== Using conflicting features provided by boards was invisible for the user until the used features resulted in a traceable problem or the user was aware of the conflict in advance from documentation ect. Now, existing and known conflicts can be recorded into `FEATURES_CONFLICT` for each board to inform the user on a conflict situation during compile time. This test requires conflicting features in its `Makefile`, i.e. `FEATURES_REQUIRED = periph_dac periph_spi`. It is expected to be presented with a warning on the conflicts with a short description message during compile time for the [stm32f4discovery](https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/wiki/Board%3A-STM32F4discovery) by now, i.e. : ``` $ make BOARD=stm32f4discovery The following features may conflict: periph_dac periph_spi Rationale: On stm32f4discovery boards there are the same pins for the DAC and/or SPI_0. EXPECT undesired behaviour! ``` The warning presents the conflicting features derived from `FEATURES_CONFLICT` and an optional message derived from `FEATURES_CONFLICT_MSG` provided int the `./RIOT/board/stm32f4discovery/Makefile.features`. Whenever an application, such as this test, requires board features that match a _conflict group_, e.g. `FEATURES_REQUIRED = periph_dac periph_spi`, a similar warning to the above will be displayed during compile time. --------- ###Usage of _conflict groups_: * Conflicting features are described in groups separated by a `:` (doublecolon) for each feature, e.g.: `FEATURES_CONFLICT = periph_spi:periph_dac`, which states that `periph_spi` conflicts with `periph_dac`. As seen above, this is the conflict of `SPI_0` pinout is shared with `DAC` on the [stm32f4discovery](https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/wiki/Board%3A-STM32F4discovery) board. * Distinct groups of conflicts are whitespace separated, e.g.: `featureA:featureB featureC:featureD`, which states that `featureA` conflicts with `featureB`, and `featureC` conflicts with `featureD`. This also means, that e.g. `FEATURES_REQUIRED = featureA featureD` would **not** produce a warning. * The groups can have an arbitrary number of conflicting features, e.g.: `featureA:featureB:featureC:featureX:featureY:featureZ` * An optional information can be given using the `FEATURES_CONFLICT_MSG`, e.g.: `FEATURES_CONFLICT_MSG = "featureA uses the same pins as featureB"` * If the required features match multiple conflict groups, **ALL** conflicting features are provided to the user, e.g.: `FEATURES_CONFLICT = featureA:featureB featureC:featureD` and `FEATURES_REQUIRED = featureA featureB featureC featureD` would result in: `The following features may conflict: featureA featureB featureC featureD`